FOWLER ET AL.

v.

LINDSEY, ET AL.; FOWLER ET AL. VS. MILLER

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Basnet v. The City of Jacksonville, 18 Fla. 523 (Fla. 1882)
• Durfee et ux. v. Duke, 375 U.S. 106 (U.S. 1963)
  …souri, could bind either Missouri or Nebraska with respect to any controversy they might have, now or in the future, as to the location of the boundary between them, or as to their respective sovereignty over the land in question. Fowler v. Lindsey, 3 Dall. 411; New York v. [*116] Connecticut, 4 Dall. 1; Land v. Dollar, 330 U. S. 731, 736-737. Either State may at any time protect its interest by initiating independent judicial proceedings here. Cf. Missouri v. Nebraska, 196 U. S. 23.15 For the reasons sta…
• State of Wis. v. Pelican Ins. Co., 127 U.S. 265 (U.S. 1888)
  …f Connecticut and New York both claimed jurisdiction; and a writ of certiorari to remove those actions into this court as belonging exclusively to its jurisdiction was refused, because a State was neither nominally nor substantially a party to them. 3 Dall. 411. Upon a bill in equity afterwards filed in this court by the State of New York against the State of Connecticut to stay the actions of ejectment, this court refused the injunction prayed for, because the State of New York was not a party to them, an…