BUNGER
v.
GREEN RIVER
BUNGER
GREEN RIVER
300 U.S. 638
Supreme Court of the United States (1937)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183, 188; Western Turf Assn. v. Greenberg, 204 U. S. 359, 363; Williams v. Arkansas, 217 U. S. 79. (2) Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 81 ; Central Lumber Co. v. South Dakota, 226 U. S. 157, 160; Bryant v. Zimmerman, 278 U. S. 63, 73. (3) Asbell v. Kansas, 209 U. S. 251, 254, 255; Savage v. Jones, 225 U. S. 501, 525; Hartford Indemnity Co. v. Illinois, 298 U. S. 155, 158.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Breard v. Alexandria, 341 U.S. 622 (U.S. 1951)…ure [or the city council], is under the commerce clause the final arbiter of the competing demands of state [or local] and national interests.” Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona, 325 U. S. 761, 769 (1945). The Court relies upon Bunger v. Green River, 300 U. S. 638 (1937), where the conviction of a Fuller Brush man was sustained under an ordinance akin to the one before us. The order was entered without argument, without opinion and with citation of the three cases discussed by the Court, ante, at p. 633, each…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U.S. 61 (U.S. 1911)
- Savage v. Jones, 225 U.S. 501 (U.S. 1912)
- NEW York ex rel. Bryant v. Zimmerman, 278 U.S. 63 (U.S. 1928)
- Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U.S. 183 (U.S. 1900)
- Cent. Lumber Co. v. State of S.D., 226 U.S. 157 (U.S. 1912)
- Asbell v. State of Kan., 209 U.S. 251 (U.S. 1908)
- W. Turf Ass'n v. Greenberg, 204 U.S. 359 (U.S. 1907)
- Williams v. State of Ark., 217 U.S. 79 (U.S. 1910)
- Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Illinois Ex rel. McLaughlin, 298 U.S. 155 (U.S. 1936)