ARKANSAS
v.
TENNESSEE

U.S. | 1937-05-17
No. 11
301 U.S. 666 Supreme Court of the United States (1937) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Arkansas v. Tennessee, 310 U.S. 563 (U.S. 1940)
    …e land described in the second count. Tennessee answered, contesting the claims of Arkansas and asserting by cross-bill its jurisdiction and sovereignty over the territory in question. The issues were referred to Monte M. Lemann as Special Master. 301 U. S. 666. The Master has filed a careful and comprehensive report recommending a decree in favor of Tennessee as to the area described in count one, and in accordance with the stipulation as to that described in count two. The case has been heard upon that r…
  • …the Comptroller’s action is plainly arbitrary, and made in bad faith.” (Emphasis added.) See United States Saving Bank v. Morgenthau, 66 App.D.C. 234, 85 F. 2d 811, 814 (1936), cert. denied, 299 U.S. 605, 57 S.Ct. 232, 81 L.Ed. 446, rehear. denied, 301 U.S. 666, 57 S.Ct. 793, 81 L.Ed. 1365.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw