GOODMAN LUMBER CO.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
GOODMAN LUMBER CO.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
301 U.S. 669
Supreme Court of the United States (1937)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed. United States v. American Sheet & Tin Plate Co., ante, p. 402.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. United States Smelting Ref. & Mining Co., 339 U.S. 186 (U.S. 1950)…ducts Refining Co. v. United States, 331 U. S. 790; Hanna Furnace Corp. v. United States, 323 U. S. 667; United States v. Wabash R. Co., 321 U. S. 403; United States v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., 304 U. S. 166; A. O. Smith Corp. v. United States, 301 U. S. 669; Goodman Lumber Co. v. United States, 301 U. S. 669. “No carrier, unless otherwise provided by this chapter, shall engage or participate in the transportation of passengers or property, as defined in this chapter, unless the rates, fares, and charg…1 / 2
-
R.R. Comm'n of Cal. v. Pac. GAS & Elec. Co., 302 U.S. 388 (U.S. 1938)…rn,” but rested its decision “solely upon the denial of due process of law by the Commission in fixing the rates in question.” Id., p. 936. Rehearing was denied. 16 F. Supp. 884. On appeal here the decree was affirmed by an equally divided court. 301 U. S. 669. Reargument was ordered (October 11, 1937) and has been had. The parties have not brought before us the evidence that was taken before the Commission or that was before [*391] the court below, with the exception of certain affidavits by the preside…
-
United States v. Wabash R.R. Co., 321 U.S. 403 (U.S. 1944)…nt investigated, the Commission has made cease and desist orders, applicable to that service, a number of which this Court has upheld on review. See United States v. American Sheet & Tin Plate Co., 301 U. S. 402; Goodman Lumber Co. v. United States, 301 U. S. 669; A. O. Smith Corp. v. United States, 301 U. S. 669; United States v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., 304 U. S. 156. In sustaining the Commission’s findings in these proceedings, as in related cases, this Court has held that the point in time and spa…1 / 2