AMARAL ET AL.
v.
CLEARY ET AL.
AMARAL ET AL.
CLEARY ET AL.
301 U.S. 687
Supreme Court of the United States (1937)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Switchmen's Union of N. Am. v. Nat'l Mediation Bd., 135 F.2d 785 (D.C. Cir. 1943)…; Chicago, S. S. & S. B. R. R. v. Fleming, 7 Cir., 109 F. 2d 419; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. National Mediation Board, 66 App.D.C. 375, 88 F. 2d 757; Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen, etc., v. Kenan, 5 Cir., 87 F. 2d 651, certiorari denied 301 U.S. 687, 57 S.Ct. 790, 81 L.Ed. 1344. It is to be noted that, in the Act, the term “representative” is always used in the singular when associated with the phrase “craft or class”, but in the plural when associated with the word “employees”. The two terms,…
-
Laurence G. Russell v. Nat'l Mediation Bd., 714 F.2d 1332 (5th Cir. 1983)…edent exists, however, the Board has clear authority to change its own procedures, so long as such changes comply with the requirements of the Act. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Kenan, 87 F. 2d 651, 654 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 301 U.S. 687, 57 S.Ct. 790, 81 L.Ed. 1344 (1937). . 45 U.S.C. § 152, Ninth, reads as follows: Ninth. If any dispute shall arise among a carrier’s employees as to who are the representatives of such employees designated and authorized in accordance with the req…