KINCHLOW
v.
PEOPLES RAPID TRANSIT CO. ET AL.

U.S. | 1937-05-17
No. 948
301 U.S. 693 Supreme Court of the United States (1937) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. v. Lewis, 99 F.2d 424 (D.C. Cir. 1938)
    …s participated in the unlawful arrest and imprisonment of the accused by the officer.” Prigg v. Lansburgh, 5 App.D.C. 30, 38; Waters v. Anthony, 20 App.D.C. 124; Kinchlow v. Peoples Rapid Transit Co., 66 App.D.C. 382, 88 F. 2d 764, certiorari denied 301 U.S. 693, 57 S.Ct. 926, 81 L.Ed. 1349. On the other hand, if defendant or 'its authorized agent actually took part in the arrest or imprisonment, it is of course responsible. Also it is responsible if it procured or instigated the officers’ acts. Takahashi v…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw