UNITED STATES
v.
LEE
UNITED STATES
LEE
301 U.S. 695
Supreme Court of the United States (1937)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Syntex Ophthalmics, Inc. v. Tsuetaki, 701 F.2d 677 (7th Cir. 1983)…ret did not make an election to obtain a patent, but instead it was appellants who had misappropriated the trade secrets and secured the patent. In 1936 we held in Shellmar Products Co. v. Allen-Qually Co., 87 F. 2d 104 (7th Cir.1936), cert. denied, 301 U.S. 695, 57 S.Ct. 923, 81 L.Ed. 1350 (1937), that a wrongdoer who has made an unlawful disclosure of another’s trade secrets cannot assert that publication to escape the protection of trade secret law. We believe that principle to be equally vital today. To…
-
Bardahl OIL Co. v. Atomic OIL Co. OF Okla., Inc., 351 F.2d 148 (10th Cir. 1965)…., 188 F.Supp. 554, 556; Hygrade Food Products Corp. v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co., 10 Cir., 46 F. 2d 771, 772; Curtis-Stephens-Embry Co. v. Pro-Tek-Toe Skate Stop Co., 8 Cir., 199 F. 2d 407, 411; Speaker v. Shaler Co., 7 Cir., 87 F. 2d 985, 987, c.d. 301 U.S. 695, 57 S.Ct. 923, 81 L.Ed. 1350. . See also: Schulmerich Electronics, Inc. v. J. C. Deagan, Inc., 202 F. 2d 772, 777, 40 CCPA 857; Kellogg Co. v. Nat. Biscuit Co., 305 U.S. 111, 118, 119, 59 S.Ct. 109, 83 L.Ed. 73; Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Lakeland G…