KEESE
v.
ZERBST, WARDEN

U.S. | 1937-05-24
No. 984
301 U.S. 698 Supreme Court of the United States (1937) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gen. Time Corp. v. Padua Alarm Sys., Inc., 199 F.2d 351 (2d Cir. 1952)
    …as it did not here, until invention was achieved. United States v. Dubilier Condenser Corp., 289 U.S. 178, 53 S.Ct. 554, 77 L.Ed. 1114, 85 A.L.R. 1488, with annotation at 1512; Heywood-Wakefield Co. v. Small, 1 Cir., 87 F. 2d 716, certiorari denied 301 U.S. 698, 57 S.Ct. 925, 81 L.Ed. [*356] 1353; American Circular Loom Co. v. Wilson, 198 Mass. 182, 84 N.E. 133; McNamara v. Powell, 256 App.Div. 554, 11 N.Y.S.2d 491; White Heat Products Co. v. Thomas, 266 Pa. 551, 109 A. 685; Dysart v. Remington Rand, Inc.,…
  • Lariscey v. The United States, 949 F.2d 1137 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
    …titative analysis of how much of the employer’s assistance was contributed to the process or during exactly what stage of development it was rendered.”) The court in Heywood-Wakefield Co. v. Small, 87 F. 2d 716, 32 USPQ 265 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 301 U.S. 698, 57 S.Ct. 925, 81 L.Ed. 1353 (1937), held there was no shop right when an employee made a cardboard model of his invention at home and showed it to his employer, who with the employee’s consent had a full-sized model built and tested in order to sat…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw