FAN SHAN HANG

v.

PRESTLIEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Lindenfeld, 142 F.2d 829 (2d Cir. 1944)
  …d States, 8 Cir., 10 F. 2d 745; Fiunkin v. United States, 9 Cir., 265 F. 1; United States v. Ginsburg, 7 Cir., 96 F. 2d 882, certiorari denied 305 U.S. 620, 59 S.Ct. 81, 83 L.Ed. 396; Ratigan v. United States, 9 Cir., 88 F. 2d 919, certiorari denied 301 U.S. 705, 57 S.Ct. 938, 81 L.Ed. 1359, rehearing denied 302 U.S. 774, 58 S.Ct. 52, 82 L.Ed. 600. As the court here charged the jury to this effect, their verdict negatives the existence of the defense. The essential question that remains before us, then, i…
• Reyes v. Marine Enters., Inc., 494 F.2d 866 (1st Cir. 1974)
  …by others, nor of injuries to persons embarking rather than going ashore. Cf. The Brand, 29 F. 2d 792 (D.Ore.1928), app. dismissed sub nom. Piper v. Knud-son, 45 F. 2d 1017 (9th Cir. 1930). But see The Shangho, 88 F. 2d 42 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 301 U.S. 705, 57 S.Ct. 938, 81 L.Ed. 1359 (1937). However, it would be entirely impractical to make the existence of a maritime cause of action turn on such fortuitous distinctions; either the crew member is guaranteed a suitable means of ingress and egress to t…