RAVENSCROFT ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Whiting v. United States, 321 F.2d 72 (1st Cir. 1963)
  …ny way upon, such other instructions. It is elementary that a supplemental charge is to be read in connection with, and in context with, the original charge, unless there is a variance. Albizu v. United States, 1 Cir., 1937, 88 F. 2d 138, cert. den. 301 U.S. 707, 57 S.Ct. 940, 81 L.Ed. 1361; Beckstead v. United States, 10 Cir., 1959, 272 F. 2d 571; Sherman v. Metropolitan Transit Authority, 1963 Mass.A.S. 552, 189 N.E. 2d 526. . A claim that such a purchase constitutes entrapment we rejected earlier this t…
• Home INS. Co. OF NEW York v. Davila, 212 F.2d 731 (1st Cir. 1954)
  …r proceedings not inconsistent with our opinion. In an earlier case, this court was made aware of the revolutionary objective of the Nationalist Party of Puerto Rico. See Albizu v. United States, 1 Cir., 1937, 88 F. 2d 138, certiorari denied, 1937, 301 U.S. 707, 57 S.Ct. 940, 81 L.Ed. 1361, in which we sustained convictions of Pedro Albizu Campos, the leader of the party, [*734] and others of his associates, for conspiracy to accomplish the political independence of Puerto Rico by force and violence and by…
• Orient Mid-East Lines, Inc. v. A Shipment OF Rice now or lately ON Bd. the S S Orient Transporter, 496 F.2d 1032 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …ue to the reason of safety of the vessel and goods”. Although evidence that the ship was in a position of peril, the statement is not conclusive. See Ravenscroft v. United States, E.D.N.Y. 1936, A.M.C. 696, aff’d, 88 F. 2d 418, 2 Cir., cert. denied, 301 U.S. 707, 57 S.Ct. 940, 81 L.Ed. 1361. Significantly, the Master jettisoned the water before he knew whether the tide would float the ship, fresh water and all. . We harbor some doubts as to whether the damage to the high pressure turbine was the result of…