CARL O. LITTLE AND VERA P. LITTLE, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
JOSEPH P. SULLIVAN, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1965-04-21
No. 64-101
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
173 So. 2d 760 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1965)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This case involves an order on mandate from the Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District, following a Supreme Court decision. The appellate court vacated its prior judgment and reversed the lower court's decision, remanding for dismissal due to failure to prosecute.


Holding

The District Court of Appeal vacated its prior judgment and reversed the lower court's final judgment, remanding the case for dismissal.


Key Quotes

“Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on August 4, 1964 (166 So. 2d 697) affirming the final judgment of the Civil Court of Record for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court's judgment by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida (173 So. 2d 135), by its opinion and judgment filed March 26, 1965 and mandate dated April 14, 1965, now lodged in this court, quashed this court's judgment for further proceedings consistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida;”

This quote establishes the procedural history and the Supreme Court's intervention that led to the current order.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The District Court of Appeal had previously affirmed a final judgment from the Civil Court of Record. However, the Supreme Court of Florida quashed th…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

ORDER ON MANDATE

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on August 4, 1964 (166 So.2d 697) affirming the final judgment of the Civil *761Court of Record for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida (173 So.2d 135), by its opinion and judgment filed March 26, 1965 and mandate dated April 14, 1965, now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment for further proceedings consistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court issued on August 28, 1964 in this cause is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed August 4, 1964 is vacated, the said opinon and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court and the final judgment of the Civil Court of Record appealed from in this cause is reversed and the cause is remanded for the entry of an order dismissing the action for failure to prosecute. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16(b) Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw