KEACH ET AL.
v.
MCDONALD ET AL.
KEACH ET AL.
MCDONALD ET AL.
302 U.S. 647
Supreme Court of the United States (1937)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Kansas.
Per Curiam:
The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 643; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Collins v. Streitz, 298 U. S. 640; (2) Iowa Central Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 393; French v. Taylor, 199 U. S. 274, 277, 278; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United Gas Pub. Serv. Co. v. Texas, 303 U.S. 123 (U.S. 1938)…mission’s rate to the years 1932 and 1933, that is, as to the revenues and expenses for those years on that basis, and as to the effect upon the rights of the appellant, with respect to those years, of the bond given on its appeal to the Commission. 302 U. S. 647. Reargument has been had accordingly. Appellant, invoking the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution, contends that in the state proceedings it has been denied procedural due process and als…
Authorities Cited
- Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312 (U.S. 1926)
- Iowa Cent. Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U.S. 389 (U.S. 1896)
- Citizens' Sav. Bank of Owensboro v. Owensboro, 173 U.S. 636 (U.S. 1899)
- Cleveland & Pittsburgh R.R. Co. v. City of Cleveland, 235 U.S. 50 (U.S. 1914)
- White River Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Ex rel. Applegate, 279 U.S. 692 (U.S. 1929)
- French v. Taylor, 199 U.S. 274 (U.S. 1905)
- Miles v. Dep't of Treas. of Ind., 298 U.S. 640 (U.S. 1936)