KENNEY, SHERIFF,
v.
MURPHY

U.S. | 1937-11-22
No. 31
302 U.S. 652 Supreme Court of the United States (1937) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Certiorari, 301 U. S. 677 (No. 909), to the Circuit Court of Kenton County, Kentucky.

Per Curiam:

After hearing argument the Court is of the opinion that the motion of the respondent to dismiss the-writ of certiorari should be granted, and the writ is accordingly dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. McKnight v. James, 155 U. S. 685; Lambert v. Barrett, 157 U. S. 697, 699, 700; Weldington v. Sloan, 54 Ky. 147; Broadwell v. Commonwealth, 98 Ky. 15; Proffer v. Stewart, 259 Ky. 445.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Rolf E. Weimar v. Yacht Club Point Ests., Inc., 223 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)
    …mitted a breach of duty apart from the contract, he is not protected by setting up a contract in respect of the same matter with another person. Aetna Insurance Company v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., 1936, 365 Ill. 303, 6 N.E. 2d 189, cert. dism. 302 U.S. 652, 58 S.Ct. 269, 82 L.Ed. 505. In the instant case, the only allegations of a duty asserted to have been breached by the person charged with the negligence is the duty created by contract. Since there are no allegations of a breach of a duty apart or…
  • Rice v. Sioux City Mem'l Park Cemetery, Inc., 349 U.S. 70 (U.S. 1955)
    …Co., 293 U. S. 530; Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 294 U. S. 696; State Automobile Ins. Assn. v. Glick, 294 U. S. 697; Moor v. Texas & N. O. R. Co., 297 U. S. 101; Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. Neill, 302 U. S. 645; Aetna Ins. Co. v. Illinois Central R. Co., 302 U. S. 652; Tax Commission v. Wilbur, 304 U. S. 544; Goodman v. United States, 305 U. S. 578; Goins v. United States, 306 U. S. 622; McGoldrick v. Gulf Oil Corp., 309 U. S. 2; Utilities Ins. Co. v. Potter, 312 U. S. 662; Harris v. Zion’s Savings Bank, 313 U. S…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw