BARNETT
v.
ROGERS, SHERIFF
BARNETT
ROGERS, SHERIFF
302 U.S. 655
Supreme Court of the United States (1937)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Brooks v. Missouri, 124 U. S. 394, 400; John v. Paullin, 231 U. S. 583, 585; Nevada-California-Oregon Ry. v. Burres, 244 U. S. 103, 105; Central Union Co. v. Edwardsville, 269 U. S. 190, 195; Kammerer v. Kroeger, 299 U. S. 302.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pope v. United States, 323 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1944)…tate courts whose exercise of judicial power, in the cases specified in Article III, § 2, Cl. 1, of the Constitution, is reviewable here by virtue of Cl. 2 of § 2. Compare Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Oklahoma, 303 U. S. 206 with Barnett v. Rogers, 302 U. S. 655. See also Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line, 211 U. S. 210, 225, 226; Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Russell, 261 U. S. 290. The Court of Claims’ determination that the Special Act conferred upon it only non-judicial functions and hence that it had no ju…
Authorities Cited
- John v. Paullin, 231 U.S. 583 (U.S. 1913)
- Cent. Union Tel. Co. v. City of Edwardsville, 269 U.S. 190 (U.S. 1925)
- Brooks v. Missouri, 124 U.S. 394 (U.S. 1888)
- Nevada-California-Oregon Railway v. Burrus, 244 U.S. 103 (U.S. 1917)
- Kammerer v. Kroeger, 299 U.S. 302 (U.S. 1936)