CHASE SECURITIES CORP.
v.
HUSBAND, COMMISSIONER OF BANKS, ET AL.
CHASE SECURITIES CORP.
HUSBAND, COMMISSIONER OF BANKS, ET AL.
302 U.S. 660
Supreme Court of the United States (1938)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Appeal from the Superior Court of Massachusetts.
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to file brief in opposition to the motion to dismiss or affirm is granted. The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) First National Bank v. Missouri, 263 U. S. 640, 666; Lewis v. Fidelity Co., 292 U. S. 559, 566; Jennings v. U. S. F. & G. Co., 294 U. S. 216, 219; Hornblower v. McGray, ante, p. 655. (2) Hudson Water Co. v. McCarter, 209 U. S. 349, 357; Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis, 240 U. S. 342, 363; Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia P. S. Corp., 248 U. S. 372, 375, 376; Home Bldg. & L. Assn. v. Blaisdell, 290 U. S. 398, 437, 438.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
First Nat'l Bank of Logan v. Walker Bank & Tr. Co., 385 U.S. 252 (U.S. 1966)…the Congress was continuing its policy of equalization first adopted in the National Bank Act of 1864. See Lewis v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 292 U. S. 559, 565-566 (1934); McClellan v. Chipman, 164 U. S. 347 (1896); Chase Securities Corp. v. Husband, 302 U. S. 660 (1938); Anderson Nat. Bank v. Duckett, 321 U. S. 233 (1944). The Comptroller argues that Utah’s statute “expressly authorizes” state banks to have branches in their home municipalities. He maintains that the restriction, in the subsequent paragraph…
-
Royal AIR Props., Inc. v. Smith, 333 F.2d 568 (9th Cir. 1964)…eholders their investments. . Matsuo Yoshida v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 240 F. 2d 824, 829 (9th Cir. 1957). . E.g., Commissioner of Banks v. Chase Sec. Corp., 298 Mass. 285, 10 N.E. 2d 472 (1937), appeal dismissed Chase Securities Corp. v. Husband, 302 U.S. 660, 58 S.Ct. 476, 82 L.Ed. 510 (1938); Nathan v. McKernan, 170 Neb. 1, 101 N.W. 2d 756 (1960); Housley v. Linnton Plywood Ass’n, 210 Or. 520, 311 P. 2d 432 (1957). . E.g., Jones v. Union Auto Indem. Ass’n, 287 F. 2d 27 (10th Cir. 1961); Chung v. Johns…
Authorities Cited
- Home Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398 (U.S. 1934)
- Hudson Cnty. Water Co. v. McCarter, 209 U.S. 349 (U.S. 1908)
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co., 240 U.S. 342 (U.S. 1916)
- First Nat'l Bank in ST. Louis v. State of Mo. at the Info. of Barrett, 263 U.S. 640 (U.S. 1924)
- Union Dry Goods Co. v. Ga. Pub. Serv. Corp., 248 U.S. 372 (U.S. 1919)
- Lewis v. Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md., 292 U.S. 559 (U.S. 1934)
- Jennings v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 294 U.S. 216 (U.S. 1935)