EX PARTE ELMER O'NEILL

Citator

Cited By

• First Nat'l Bank of Logan v. Walker Bank & Tr. Co., 385 U.S. 252 (U.S. 1966)
  …the Congress was continuing its policy of equalization first adopted in the National Bank Act of 1864. See Lewis v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 292 U. S. 559, 565-566 (1934); McClellan v. Chipman, 164 U. S. 347 (1896); Chase Securities Corp. v. Husband, 302 U. S. 660 (1938); Anderson Nat. Bank v. Duckett, 321 U. S. 233 (1944). The Comptroller argues that Utah’s statute “expressly authorizes” state banks to have branches in their home municipalities. He maintains that the restriction, in the subsequent paragraph…
• Royal AIR Props., Inc. v. Smith, 333 F.2d 568 (9th Cir. 1964)
  …eholders their investments. . Matsuo Yoshida v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 240 F. 2d 824, 829 (9th Cir. 1957). . E.g., Commissioner of Banks v. Chase Sec. Corp., 298 Mass. 285, 10 N.E. 2d 472 (1937), appeal dismissed Chase Securities Corp. v. Husband, 302 U.S. 660, 58 S.Ct. 476, 82 L.Ed. 510 (1938); Nathan v. McKernan, 170 Neb. 1, 101 N.W. 2d 756 (1960); Housley v. Linnton Plywood Ass’n, 210 Or. 520, 311 P. 2d 432 (1957). . E.g., Jones v. Union Auto Indem. Ass’n, 287 F. 2d 27 (10th Cir. 1961); Chung v. Johns…