HINDERLIDER, STATE ENGINEER, ET AL.

v.

LAPLATA RIVER & CHERRY CREEK DITCH CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Anderson Nat'l Bank v. Luckett, 321 U.S. 233 (U.S. 1944)
  …onary power over the deposits in national banks, and that the act imposes a burden on appellants such as was held to be inadmissible in First National Bank v. California, 262 U. S. 366, which was followed in National City Bank v. Philippine Islands, 302 U. S. 661. As we have seen, the only power sought to be exerted by the state over the depositors’ accounts is the assertion of its lawfully acquired right to collect them, in accordance with the obligation, which was both assumed by appellant and is to be per…
• Collins v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co., 304 U.S. 518 (U.S. 1938)
  …stilled spirits in excess of proof strength shall be taxed at double-the above rate.” Statutes 1937, ch. 758; operative July 1, 1937; Mid-Northern Oil Co. v. Walker, 268 U. S. 45, 49; Rainier Nat. Park Co. v. Martin, 18 F. Supp. 481, 486, affirmed, 302 U. S. 661, on the authority of the Walker case. ‘ In this view we need" not consider appellants’ argument that the Constitution of California forbids, the release of the taxing power. Standard Oil Co. v. California, 291 U. S. 242. Rainier National Park v. M…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United States v. Wert, 102 F.2d 10 (8th Cir. 1939)
  …o make the jurisdictional amount. Simecek v. United States Nat. Bank, 8 Cir., 91 F. 2d 214, 217; Kimel v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co., 10 Cir., 71 F. 2d 921, 924, and cases cited; Rainier Nat. Park Co. v. Martin, D.C., 18 F.Supp. 481, 486, affirmed 302 U.S. 661, 58 S.Ct. 478, 82 L.Ed. 511. The actions brought by the defendant in the state court are also in personam. The issues of fact in five of them are triable by jury. All of them are based upon the same alleged wrong committed by the plaintiff and its…