STEPHEN RICHARD DIEHL, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Elouise Wright v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. OF Miami, 256 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)
  …instructions' which appellant now assails, the court’s giving such instructions may not be assigned as error, and we cannot consider the merits of the questions presented by appellant. Rule 1.-470(b) R.C.P., 30 F.S.A.; Eicholz v. Frey, Fla.App.1965, 173 So. 2d 771, and Smith v. Tantlinger, Fla.App.1958, 102 So. 2d 840. Affirmed. REED, C. J., and CROSS, J., concur.…
• Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co. v. Hendrickson, 212 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
  …The cases are legion in which our appellate courts have refused to consider a claimed error in an instruction when no objection was made to it at the trial. See, e. g., Williams v. State, 1893, 32 Fla. 251, 13 So. 429; Eicholz v. Frey, Fla.App.1965, 173 So. 2d 771; City of Miami Beach v. Belle Isle Apt. Corp., Fla.App.1965, 177 So. 2d 884. The law was equally well settled that one could not properly complain on appeal of error for which he was himself re [*903] sponsible, nor for rulings or instructions that…
• Hoban v. Gerlando Constantino, 240 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Sharpsteen v. Keesler, Fla.App.1965, 178 So. 2d 623; Henningsen v. Smith, Fla.App.1965, 174 So. 2d 85; Eicholz v. Frey, Fla.App.1965, 173 So. 2d 771; and Rule 1.470(b), R.C.P., 30 F.S.A.…

Authorities Cited

• Harper v. State, 168 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964)
• Govoni v. Blackwell, 167 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
• Manning v. State, 167 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964)