DEMAROIS

v.

FARREL, U. S. MARSHAL, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Strand v. Schmittroth, 251 F.2d 590 (9th Cir. 1957)
  …ct Court. United States ex rel. Spellman v. Murphy, 7 Cir., 217 F. 2d 247, 250, makes the same point regarding trial by the state of a federal probationer, while United States ex rel. Demarois v. Farrell, 8 Cir., 87 F. 2d 957, 962, certiorari denied 302 U.S. 683, 58 S.Ct. 31, 82 L.Ed. 527, on like facts, notes that the federal authorities “permitted” the state sentence to run. In each one of these cases, the sovereign, held to have agreed in one way or another to proceedings by the other sovereign, did not…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• United States v. Wazney, 529 F.2d 1287 (9th Cir. 1976)
  …that an accused leaves his usual place of abode and conceals himself for the purpose of avoiding arrest or prosecution. Ferebee v. United States, 295 F. 850 (4th Cir. 1924). See United States v. Farrell, 87 F. 2d 957, 960 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 683, 58 S.Ct. 31, 82 L.Ed. 527 (1937). But see Greene v. United States, 154 F. 401, 411 (5th Cir.), cert denied, 207 U.S. 596, 28 S.Ct. 261, 52 L.Ed. 857 (1907). In modern large and heavily populated districts it is almost as easy to avoid arrest or…
• United States v. Wild (D.D.C. 1977)
  …970) which applies as an exception to all federal statutes of limitations provides: No statute of limitations shall extend to any person fleeing from justice. . United States ex rel. Demarois v. Farrell, 87 F. 2d 957, 960 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 683, 58 S.Ct. 31, 82 L.Ed. 527 (1937).…