KUPTZ ET AL.

v.

RALPH SOLLITT & SONS CONSTRUCTION CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Green v. River Terminal Ry. Co., 763 F.2d 805 (6th Cir. 1985)
  …icient cause of or the instrumentality through which the injury is directly brought about.” Reetz v. Chicago & Erie Railroad Co., 46 F. 2d 50, 52 (6th Cir.1931); Anderson v. Baltimore & Ohio Railway Co., 89 F. 2d 629, 630-31 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 696-97, 58 S.Ct. 14, 82 L.Ed. 538 (1937). While it is uncontested that the radio on the engine was inoperable, the district court directed a verdict in favor of RTR on the basis that the radio was not a proximate cause of Green’s injuries. 585 F.Supp.…
• Archie & Allan Spiers, Inc. v. United States, 296 F.2d 757 (Ct. Cl. 1961)
  …S.Ct. 225, 66 L.Ed. 433; Anthony M. Meyerstein, Inc. v. United States, 137 F.Supp. 427, 133 Ct.Cl. 694; Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co. v. United States, 130 F.Supp. 368, 131 Ct.Cl. 490; Triest & Earle v. United States, 84 Ct.Cl. 84, cert. denied 302 U.S. 696, 58 S.Ct. 14, 82 L.Ed. 538; General Contracting Corp. v. United States, 88 Ct.Cl. 214. In other words, as the court stated in Midland Land & Improvement Co. v. United States, 58 Ct.Cl. 671, 683, aff’d 270 U.S. 251, 46 S.Ct. 218, 70 L.Ed. 570: “The…
• Anderson v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 96 F.2d 796 (2d Cir. 1938)
  …intained in suitable condition and tested before each trip. The first trial resulted in a directed verdict and judgment for the defendant, which was reversed on appeal to this court. Anderson v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 89 F. 2d 629; certiorari denied 302 U.S. 696, 58 S.Ct. 14, 82 L.Ed. -. On the second trial the jury found a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $12,000. From the judgment entered thereon the defendant has appealed. Anderson was killed by a train on an adjacent track while he was standing…