BORLAND ET AL.
v.
JOHNSON, DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL.
BORLAND ET AL.
JOHNSON, DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL.
302 U.S. 704
Supreme Court of the United States (1937)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Norwood v. Parenteau, 228 F.2d 148 (8th Cir. 1955)…483, 75 S.Ct. 461; Tate v. Arnold, 8 Cir., 1955, 223 F. 2d 782. The action of the District Court in dismissing this case was entirely proper. Affirmed. . See Borland v. Johnson, 9 Cir., 1937, 88 S.Ct. 24, 82 L.Ed. 544. F. 2d 376, certiorari denied 302 U.S. 704, 58…
-
Omri E. Daniels, Jr. v. Thomas, 225 F.2d 795 (10th Cir. 1955)…rtiorari denied, 1940, 311 U.S. 655, 61 S.Ct. 8, 85 L.Ed. 419; Hendron v. Yount-Lee Oil Co., 5 Cir., 108 F. 2d 759, cer-tiorari denied, 1940, 311 U.S. 664, 61 S.Ct. 21, 85 L.Ed. 426; Borland v. Johnson, 9 Cir., 88 F. 2d 376, certiorari denied, 1937, 302 U.S. 704, 58 S.Ct. 24, 82 L.Ed. 544; Daniel B. Frazier Co. v. Long Beach Township, 3 Cir., 1935, 77 F. 2d 764; Fryberger v. Parker, 8 Cir., 1928, 28 F. 2d 493; Lake v. Central Sav. Bank, 9 Cir., 1928, 27 F. 2d 847, certiorari denied, 1929, 279 U.S. 836, 49 S…