UNITED STATES
v.
ORDNANCE ENGINEERING CORP.; AND ORDNANCE ENGINEERING CORP. V. UNITED STATES
UNITED STATES
ORDNANCE ENGINEERING CORP.; AND ORDNANCE ENGINEERING CORP. V. UNITED STATES
302 U.S. 708
Supreme Court of the United States (1937)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Burgess v. Nail, 103 F.2d 37 (10th Cir. 1939)…ell settled that Congress has plenary power to reimpose restrictions. Whitehurch v. Crawford, 10 Cir., 92 F,, 2d 249, 253; Holmes v. United States, 10 Cir., 53 F. 2d 960, 962; United States v. Getzelman, 10 Cir., 89 F. 2d 531, 536, certiorari denied 302 U.S. 708, 58 S.Ct. 27, 82 L.Ed. 547; Hickey v. United States, 10 Cir., 64 F. 2d 628, 631; Taylor v. Tayrien, 10 Cir., 51 F. 2d 884, 887, certiorari denied 284 U.S. 672, 52 S.Ct. 127, 76 L.Ed. 569; McCurdy v. United States, 246 U.S. 263, 273, 38 S.Ct. 289, 62…