CONTINENTAL LAND CO. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Cooper, 277 F.2d 857 (5th Cir. 1960)
  …on being combined with other tracts for this special or higher use in the reasonably near future. Olson v. United States, 202 U.S. 246, 255-256, 54 S.Ct. 704, 78 L.Ed. 1236; Continental Land Co. v. United States, 88 F. 2d 104, 111, certiorari denied 302 U.S. 715, 58 S.Ct. 36, 82 L.Ed. 552.” . Both by a pretrial ruling, a continuing objection allowed by the court at the beginning of the trial, and by objection after the conclusion of the court’s charge, appellant effectively raised the issue and preserved i…
• Pub. Util. Dist. NO. 1 OF Pend Oreille Cnty. v. City OF Seattle, 382 F.2d 666 (9th Cir. 1967)
  …t. United States ex rel. TVA v. Powelson, 319 U.S. 266, 63 S.Ct. 1047, 87 L.Ed. 1390 (1943); Olson v. United States, 292 U.S. 246, 54 S.Ct. 704, 78 L.Ed. 1236 (1934); Continental Land Co. v. United States, 88 F. 2d 104 (9th Cir. 1937), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 715, 58 S.Ct. 36, 82 L.Ed. 552 (1937); United States v. Cooper, 277 F. 2d 857 (5th Cir. 1960). The District Court found that while PUD had not yet completed the assembling of its land package, it could be credited with it nonetheless, since it could re…