PACIFIC COAST BISCUIT CO.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Gross, 416 F.2d 1205 (8th Cir. 1969)
  …nds. Dosek v. United States, 405 F. 2d 405, 409 (8 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 943, 89 S.Ct. 2014, 23 L.Ed.2d 461; Galbraith v. United States, 387 F. 2d 617, 618 (10 Cir. 1968); Newfield v. Ryan, 91 F. 2d 700, 703 (5 Cir. 1937), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 729, 58 S.Ct. 54, 82 L.Ed. 563; Pollard v. Roberts, 283 F.Supp. 248, 259 (E.D.Ark.1968), aff’d, 393 U.S. 14, 89 S.Ct. 47, 21 L.Ed.2d 14. Our case of Schwimmer v. United States, 232 F. 2d 855 (8 Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 833, 77 S.Ct. 48, 1 L.Ed…
• Super Prods. Corp. v. D P WAY Corp., 546 F.2d 748 (7th Cir. 1976)
  …the claim even though his invention might have justified patent protection, and we cannot do indirectly, that is by construction, what we cannot do directly. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. Lever Bros. Co., 90 F. 2d 178, 194 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 729, 58 S.Ct. 54, 82 L.Ed. 563 (1937). The District Court was correct in rejecting defendant’s proposed testimony and in proceeding to summary judgment. Defendant asserts that, in light of the prosecution history before the Patent Office and the rema…
• Dominion Magnesium Ltd. v. The United States, 320 F.2d 388 (Ct. Cl. 1963)
  …description and claimed by the patentee — we must read the claims in the light of the descriptions and drawings. While a court cannot rewrite a claim (cf. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. Lever Bros. Co., 90 F. 2d 178, 194 (C.A. 7, 1937), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 729, 58 S.Ct. 54, 82 L.Ed. 563 (1937)), a reference to the whole specification is often necessary to determine (but not enlarge) the meaning of the claims that will fairly and reasonably be supported both by the language chosen by the patentee and by th…