LOUISIANA & ARKANSAS RY. CO.

v.

FRANCIS

Citator

Cited By

• Brown v. Avemco Inv. Corp., 603 F.2d 1367 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …tated, contentions [*1381] which are not specified in the appellants’ brief should not be considered by the reviewing court. Palacios v. Government of Guam, 325 F. 2d 543 (CA9 1963); United States v. Shingle, 91 F. 2d 85, 87 (CA9 1937), cert. denied 302 U.S. 746, 58 S.Ct. 264, 82 L.Ed. 577. An alleged error in refusing to give a requested instruction should be disregarded where it is not specified in the appellants’ brief. Muyres v. United States, 89 F. 2d 783, 784 (CA9 1937). Moreover, even as late as the…
• N.Y. Tel. Co. v. United States, 136 F.2d 87 (2d Cir. 1943)
  …s fictional to say that its property was not taken. But the Government’s liability for compensation to be awarded herein is limited by- the statute authorizing the proceeding. Cf. United States v. Shingle, 9 Cir., 91 F. 2d 85, 89, certiorari denied, 302 U.S. 746, 58 S.Ct. 264, 82 L.Ed. 577; Kanakanui v. United States, 9 Cir., 244 F. 923; Carlisle v. Cooper, 2 Cir., 64 F. 472. There is no suggestion that the declaration of taking has been amended. Without that the allowance of compensation herein would be u…
• United States v. Waterhouse, 132 F.2d 699 (9th Cir. 1943)
  …dence of the market value of the land. North American Telegraph Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co., 8 Cir., 254 F. 417, certiorari denied 249 U.S. 607, 39 S.Ct. 290, 63 L.Ed. 799; United States v. Shingle, 9 Cir., 91 F. 2d 85, 89, certiorari [*703] denied 302 U.S. 746, 58 S.Ct. 264, 82 L.Ed. 577. Appellant’s argument is based on the assumption that appellees’ witnesses were testifying as to what prices the land would sell for if subdivided, and as to rents which could be derived from the land if it were improved…