ATLANTIC PIPE LINE CO.

v.

BROWN COUNTY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• In re First Colonial Corp. OF Am. v. Franz J. Baddock, 544 F.2d 1291 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …has been specially limited to forbid it. Securities and Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co., 310 U.S. at 460, 60 S.Ct. at 1055, 84 L.Ed. at 1306; Texas v. Anderson, Clayton & Co., 92 F. 2d 104, 106 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 747, 58 S.Ct. 265, 82 L.Ed. 578 (1937); 7A C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure, § 1920, at 611 (1972). It follows that American Benefit had standing to challenge in the district court all of the orders of the bankruptcy judge awarding…
• Swift Textiles, Inc. v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc., 799 F.2d 697 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …e carriage, does not change its character. State of Texas v. Anderson, Clayton & Co., 92 F. 2d 104, 107 (5th Cir.) (shipper intended cotton for export when cotton sent from Rochester, Texas to Houston; thus not an intrastate shipment), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 747, 58 S.Ct. 265, 82 L.Ed. 578 (1937). A significant case on point applying the “intent” test is North Carolina Utilities Commission v. United States, 253 F.Supp. 930 (E.D.N.C.1966) (three-judge district court). In NCUC, a retail hardware chain rece…
• State OF Tex. v. United States, 866 F.2d 1546 (5th Cir. 1989)
  …. Armstrong, 2 I.C.C.2d at 72. . 565 F. 2d 615 (9th Cir.1977). . Id. at 620. . Armstrong, 2 I.C.C.2d at 73 (citing Southern Pacific, 565 F. 2d at 619). . Id. at 73. . Texas v. Anderson, Clayton & Co., 92 F. 2d 104, 107 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 747, 58 S.Ct. 265, 82 L.Ed. 578 (1937). . 719 F. 2d 304 (9th Cir.1983). . 407 F. 2d 1173 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 819, 90 S.Ct. 56, 24 L.Ed.2d 70 (1969). . 719 F. 2d at 310. . Id. . Northwest Terminal Elevator Ass'n v. Minnesota PUC, 576…