MOSKOVITZ

v.

ROYAL INDEMNITY CO.

Citator

Cited By

• MacHwart v. State, 222 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)
  …r the arraignment. In other words, the trial and conviction occurred on a separate occasion. These were delayed in order that a pre-sentence investigation could be made. [*41] In Horton v. State, Fla.App.1964, 170 So. 2d 470, cert. denied, Fla.1965, 174 So. 2d 33, the First District Court of Appeal noted the distinction between arraignment, .trial, and conviction. It stated that all three of these steps constituted critical stages in the proceeding. Even though these stages took place during a single confron…
• Roberts v. State, 655 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
  …gnized as a separate stage for which defendant had right to be present); Horton v. State, 170 So. 2d 470, 472 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964) (arraignment, trial, and conviction recognized as separate “critical stages” requiring offer of counsel), cert. denied, 174 So. 2d 33 (Fla.1965). As a result, while I agree fully with the majority that the Appellant’s question at the outset of trial, “I’d also like to know where my co-counsel is — Susan,” signalled to the trial court Appellant’s confusion concerning the waiver of…