CARTER
v.
WOODRING, SECRETARY OF WAR
CARTER
WOODRING, SECRETARY OF WAR
302 U.S. 752
Supreme Court of the United States (1937)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Burns v. Wilson, 346 U.S. 844 (U.S. 1953)…est above quoted was unassailable even by the most extreme allegations of prejudice, unfairness, and use of perjured testimony. See Carter v. Woodring, 67 App. D. C. 393, 92 F. 2d 544. Thus, up to December 6, 1937, when the Court denied certiorari (302 U. S. 752) in the case last cited — it was the last of Oberlin Carter’s long series of attempts at judicial review of his court-martial — the scope of habeas corpus in both military and civil cases was equally narrow: in both classes of cases it was limited s…
-
James Richardson & Sons v. Conners Marine Co., Inc., 141 F.2d 226 (2d Cir. 1944)…gshoved, 2 Cir., 290 F. 733, certiorari denied 263 U.S. 707, 44 S.Ct. 35, 68 L.Ed. 517; Hawn v. American S. S. Co., 2 Cir., 107 F. 2d 999, 1000; Hunt v. United States, D.C. S.D.N.Y., 17 F.Supp. 578, affirmed 2 Cir., 91 F. 2d 1014, certiorari denied 302 U.S. 752, 58 S.Ct. 271, 82 L.Ed. 581; Robinson on Admiralty (1939) 162, 189-192. Here obviously libellant hoped to push the grain along to England with the greatest expedition possible, and the only reason for the long delay was the unusual condition due to…
-
Burns v. Lovett, 202 F.2d 335 (D.C. Cir. 1952)…C.A. § 551 et seq. . 41 Stat. 797 (1920), 10 U.S.C.A. § 1522; 64 Stat. 128 (1950), 50 U.S.C.A. § 653. . Dynes v. Hoover, 1858, 20 How. 65, 61 U. S. 65, 15 L.Ed. 838; Carter v. Woodring, 1937, 67 App.D.C. 393, 92 F. 2d 544, certiorari denied, 1937, 302 U.S. 752, 58 S.Ct. 283, 82 L.Ed. 582; United States ex rel. Wessels v. McDonald, D.C.E.D.N.Y., 265 F. 754, appeal dismissed, 1921, 256 U.S. 705, 41 S.Ct. 535, 65 L.Ed. 1180; Ex parte Potens, D.C.E.D.Wis.1945, 63 F.Supp. 582. . Whelchel v. McDonald, 1950, 34…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence