HARRY T. ROLLINS
v.
HELVERING, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; GLENDORA M. ROLLINS V. SAME; MARGARET C. ROLLINS V. SAME; HARRY T. ROLLINS ET AL., EXECUTORS, V. SAME; AND RALPH E. ROLLINS V. SAME
HARRY T. ROLLINS
HELVERING, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; GLENDORA M. ROLLINS V. SAME; MARGARET C. ROLLINS V. SAME; HARRY T. ROLLINS ET AL., EXECUTORS, V. SAME; AND RALPH E. ROLLINS V. SAME
302 U.S. 763
Supreme Court of the United States (1938)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
White v. Higgins, 116 F.2d 312 (1st Cir. 1940)…stitutes little hindrance to him if he wants to get the property back. See Cox v. Commissioner, 10 Cir., 110 F. 2d 934, 936, certiorari denied, October 14, 1940, 61 S.Ct. 26, 85 L.Ed. -; Rollins v. Helvering, 8 Cir., 92 F. 2d 390, certiorari denied, 302 U.S. 763, 58 S.Ct. 409, 82 L.Ed. 592. Cf. Commissioner v. Morton, 7 Cir., 108 F. 2d 1005. If the question comes to us again in a new case we shall feel free to re-examine it. But the question was fully and fairly presented to this court on the earlier appe…