ROBINS ET AL.

v.

WETTLAUFER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Farmhand, Inc. v. Craven, 455 F.2d 609 (8th Cir. 1972)
  …ce of a claim. Stubnitz-Greene Spring Corp. v. Fort Pitt Bedding Co., 110 F. 2d 192, 198 (6 Cir. 1940); Heywood-Wakefield Co. v. Frank & Son, Inc., 98 F. 2d 772 (2 Cir. 1938); Robins v. Wettlaufer, 81 F. 2d 882, 893, 23 CCPA 952 (1936), cert. denied 302 U.S. 766, 58 S.Ct. 477, 82 L.Ed. 594 (1938). Terms such as “generally equal” will not be held to a precise limitation when the record makes it obvious that they were intended to convey exactly the opposite meaning — that of an approximation. We conclude t…
• J. C. ENO (U. S.) Ltd. v. COE (D.D.C. 1939)
• G. v. Feeley, 230 F.2d 316 (9th Cir. 1956)
  …ardless of the danger, or to have failed to make a vigilant use of his senses. In such a situation the traveler is the author of the misfortune which befalls him. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Taulbee, 9 Cir., 1937, 92 F. 2d 20, certiorari denied, 1938, 302 U.S. 766, 58 S.Ct. 476, 82 L.Ed. 595; Roberts v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 1923, 67 Mont. 472, 216 P. 332. A person approaching a railroad crossing is required to take all reasonable precautions to assure himself by actual observation that there is no da…