NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO.

v.

GRAHAM

Citator

Cited By

• Interstate Drop Forge Co. v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 326 F.2d 743 (7th Cir. 1964)
  …ion under the penalty of incorporating it into the fabric of the statute appears to us unwarranted; our fiscal legislation is detailed and specific enough already.” F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United States, 91 F. 2d 973, 976 (2d Cir.1937), cert, denied, 302 U.S. 768, 58 S.Ct. 479, 82 L.Ed. 597 (1938). If the application of the re-enactment doctrine gave interpretive regulations the force of law without reservation, administrative agencies would lose their power to change previously promulgated rules either ret…
• Moore v. Harris, 623 F.2d 908 (4th Cir. 1980)
  …already. While we are of course bound to weigh seriously such rulings, they are never conclusive; here, it seems to us that they are not enough to turn the scale. F.W. Woolworth Co. v. United States, 91 F. 2d 973, 976 (2d Cir. 1937), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 768, 58 S.Ct. 479, 82 L.Ed. 597 (1938). As her last shot, the Secretary puts forth the contention that, in 1978, when Congress clearly included self-employed miners among the beneficiaries of the act,58 the Committee reports treated that inclusion as a…
• Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, 740 F.2d 1262 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …). Congress is not obliged to “correct each mistaken [administrative] construction under penalty of incorporating it into the fabric of the statute.” F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United States, 91 F. 2d 973, 976 (2d Cir. 1937) (L. Hand, J.), cert, denied, 302 U.S. 768, 58 S.Ct. 479, 481, 82 L.Ed. 597 (1938). When Congress amends a law without addressing extant administrative rulings, its “failure to take action ... is subject to more than one interpretation.” Chisholm, v. FCC, 538 F. 2d 349, 363 (D.C.Cir.), cert,…