EX PARTE BRYANT MCQUILLEN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Smith v. State, 237 So. 2d 139 (Fla. 1970)
  …ulfills the foregoing requirements does not deny due process of law, even though it is not confined to a definition of specific acts. Matteson v. City of Eustis, 140 Fla. 591, 190 So. 558; Poole v. State, 129 Fla. 841, 177 So. 195, appeal dismissed, 303 U.S. 619, 58 S.Ct. 611, 82 L.Ed. 1084. “Impossible standards are not required, however, statutory language that conveys a definite warning as to proscribed conduct when measured by common understanding and practices satisfies due process. United States v. P…
• City OF ST. Petersburg v. Calbeck, 114 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)
  …ulfills the foregoing requirements does not deny due process of law, even though it is not confined to a definition of specific acts. Matteson v. City of Eustis, 140 Fla. 591, 190 So. 558; Poole v. State, 129 Fla. 841, 177 So. 195, appeal dismissed, 303 U.S. 619, 58 S.Ct. 611, 82 L.Ed. 1084. Impossible standards are not required, however, statutory language that conveys a definite warning as to proscribed conduct when measured by common understanding and practices satisfies due process. United States v. Pe…
• McARTHUR v. State, 191 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 1966)
  …ulfills the foregoing requirements does not deny due process of law, even though it is not confined to a definition of specific acts. Matteson v. City of Eustis, 140 Fla. 591, 190 So. 558; Poole v. State, 129 Fla. 841, 177 So. 195, appeal dismissed, 303 U.S. 619, 58 S.Ct. 611, 82 L.Ed. 1084.” The decision in City of St. Petersburg v. Calbeck, supra, was cited with approval by the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in Snow v. State, 179 So. 2d 99, upholding a vagrancy ordinance. In State v. Suess, 2…