POOLE
v.
FLORIDA

U.S. | 1938-02-14
No. 748
303 U.S. 619 Supreme Court of the United States (1938) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Commission, 255 U. S. 445, 448, 449; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317; Susquehanna Co. v. Tax Commission (No. 2) 283 U. S. 297, 299, 300; Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. South Carolina, 291 U. S. 652. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. State, 237 So. 2d 139 (Fla. 1970)
    …ulfills the foregoing requirements does not deny due process of law, even though it is not confined to a definition of specific acts. Matteson v. City of Eustis, 140 Fla. 591, 190 So. 558; Poole v. State, 129 Fla. 841, 177 So. 195, appeal dismissed, 303 U.S. 619, 58 S.Ct. 611, 82 L.Ed. 1084. “Impossible standards are not required, however, statutory language that conveys a definite warning as to proscribed conduct when measured by common understanding and practices satisfies due process. United States v. P…
  • City OF ST. Petersburg v. Calbeck, 114 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)
    …ulfills the foregoing requirements does not deny due process of law, even though it is not confined to a definition of specific acts. Matteson v. City of Eustis, 140 Fla. 591, 190 So. 558; Poole v. State, 129 Fla. 841, 177 So. 195, appeal dismissed, 303 U.S. 619, 58 S.Ct. 611, 82 L.Ed. 1084. Impossible standards are not required, however, statutory language that conveys a definite warning as to proscribed conduct when measured by common understanding and practices satisfies due process. United States v. Pe…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw