JOHNSON
v.
ZERBST, WARDEN

U.S. | 1938-02-14
No. 699
303 U.S. 629 Supreme Court of the United States (1938) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (U.S. 1938)
    …, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining Witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.” 92 F. 2d 748. 303 U. S. 629. Opinion of the District Judge, 13 F. Supp. 253, 254. 13 F. Supp. 253, 254. 13 F. Supp. at 256; see, Rules of Practice and Procedure (Criminal Appeals Rules), adopted May 7, 1934, II, III. Cf., Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U. S. 319, 325. Patton v…
  • Bandy v. United States, 296 F.2d 882 (8th Cir. 1961)
    …yed a handwriting expert, his services would have been paid for in accordance with the order of the District Court. Bridwell v. Aderhold, D.C.N.D.Ga., 1935, 13 F.Supp. 253, affirmed Johnson v. Zerbst, 5 Cir., 1937, 92 F. 2d 748, certiorari granted, 303 U.S. 629, 58 S.Ct. 610, 82 L.Ed. 1089, reversed Johnson v. Zerbst, 1938, 304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461, is entirely concerned with whether or not the petitioners competently and intelligently waived their right to counsel and whether or not habe…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw