CLARKE, TRUSTEE

v.

CHICAGO, B. & Q. R. CO.

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• Luck v. United States, 348 F.2d 763 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
  …losed by the statute from inquiry into the nature of the “crime” or its relevance where the credibility of the witness is sought to be impeached by proof of the conviction. Bostic v. United States, 68 App.D.C. 167, 94 F. 2d 636 (1937), cert. denied, 303 U.S. 635, 58 S.Ct. 523, 82 L.Ed. 1095 (1938); and see Campbell v. United States, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 133, 176 F. 2d 45 (1949). . See, e. g., Grunewald v. United States, 353 U.S. 391, 418-424, 77 S.Ct. 963, 1 L.Ed.2d 931 (1957); cf. Walder v. United States, 347…
• Austin v. United States, 382 F.2d 129 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …for himself only in the first portion of his text nevertheless exhibited in note 4 the portion of the instructions on deliberation which the majority approved. . Bostic v. United States, 68 App.D.C. 167, 171, 94 F. 2d 636, 640 (1937), cert. denied, 303 U.S. 635, 58 S.Ct. 523, 82 L.Ed. 1095 (1938). There, Judge Justin Miller abstracted the principles from various cases from which he concluded “that no particular length of time is necessary for deliberation,” 68 App.D.C. 169, 94 F. 2d 638, and that period of…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Shaw, 701 F.2d 367 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …e some appreciable time for reflection and consideration before execution of the act, although the period of time “does not require the lapse of days or hours or even minutes.” Bostic v. United States, 94 F. 2d 636, 638 (D.C.Cir.1937), cert. denied, 303 U.S. 635, 58 S.Ct. 523, 82 L.Ed. 1095 (1938). The distinction which marks the line between “deliberation” sufficient to support a conviction of first degree murder and the lesser killing with malice which supports conviction of second degree murder is less…