CUDAHY PACKING CO.
v.
MCBRIDE
CUDAHY PACKING CO.
MCBRIDE
303 U.S. 639
Supreme Court of the United States (1938)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Tr. Co., 305 U.S. 47 (U.S. 1938)…entable a combination including one element not described in the original application for the Gulick patent and later added to it by amendment, and not described at all in the Maynard patent, was at first denied, there being no conflict of decision. 303 U. S. 639. We later granted certiorari, 304 U. S. 587, on a petition for rehearing showing that, notwithstanding the doubtful validity of the patents, litigation elsewhere with a resulting conflict of decision was improbable because of the concentration of th…
-
Ballinger v. The I. V. Sutphin Co., 332 F.2d 436 (6th Cir. 1964)…care in keeping the premises reasonably safe for the plaintiff in the performance of his duties arising out of the relationship between the defendant and the carrier. See: Cudahy Packing Co. v. McBride, 92 F. 2d 737, 739-740, C.A.8th, cert. denied, 303 U.S. 639, 58 S.Ct. 526, 82 L.Ed. 1099; Robey v. Keller, 114 F. 2d 790, 795, C.A.4th; 65 C.J.S. Negligence, § 43(4) a, and cases cited in Note 68. On the issue of contributory negligence, the defendant relies strongly upon Manes v. Hines & McNair Hotels, Inc…