SIMPSON ET AL.

v.

DYER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Everett v. United States, 336 F.2d 979 (D.C. Cir. 1964)
  …tates, 33 F. 2d 263, 264 (8th Cir. 1929); see United States v. Smiley, 322 F. 2d 248, 249 (2d Cir. 1963) (per curiam); cf. Tomlinson v. United States, 68 U.S.App.D.C. 106, 108, 93 F. 2d 652, 654 (1937), cert. denied sub nom., Pratt v. United States, 303 U.S. 642, 58 S.Ct. 645, 82 L.Ed. 1102 (1938); Hoyt v. United States, supra note 15; United [*984] States v. Lias, supra note 11. But cf. Kadwell v. United States, supra note 14. In the recent Nagelberg case, the Supreme Court held that the District Court ha…
• Jackson v. United States, 359 F.2d 260 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
  …and its proof was not required. United States v. Noveck, 271 U.S. 201, 203, 46 S.Ct. 476, 70 L.Ed. 904 (1926); Tomlinson v. United States, 68 App.D.C. 106, 108, 93 F. 2d 652, 654, 114 A.L.R. 1315 (1937), cert. denied sub nom. Pratt v. United States, 303 U.S. 642, 58 S.Ct. 645, 82 L.Ed. 1107 (1938). The federal courts have scrapped the old rule condemning every variance between indictment and proof, and convictions are not now set aside except for variance resulting in substantial prejudice to defendant. Ber…
• Nager Elec. Co., Inc. v. The United States, 368 F.2d 847 (Ct. Cl. 1966)
  …States, 66 Ct.Cl. 31, 37-38 (1928); Southern Pacific Co. v. United States, 67 Ct.Cl. 414, 420-422 (1929), cert. denied, 280 U.S. 567, 50 S.Ct. 26, 74 L.Ed. 620; Pink, Superintendent of Ins. v. United States, 85 Ct.Cl. 121, 124 (1937), cert. denied, 303 U.S. 642, 58 S.Ct. 641, 82 L.Ed. 1102; Joplin v. United States, 89 Ct.Cl. 345, 356, 362-363 (1939). . Conversely, the court has made it clear that suit does not have to be brought on each individual item as it occurs prior to final completion-and-acceptance…

  ← 1 / 2 →