PINK, SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE,
v.
DEMPSEY; AND DEMPSEY V. PINK, SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE
PINK, SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE,
DEMPSEY; AND DEMPSEY V. PINK, SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE
303 U.S. 648
Supreme Court of the United States (1938)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
LAW Enf't Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Corcoran, 807 F.2d 38 (2d Cir. 1986)…ed by another. General Baking Co. v. Harr, 300 U.S. 433, 57 S.Ct. 540, 81 L.Ed. 730 (1937); Commonwealth Trust Co. of Pittsburgh v. Bradford, 297 U.S. 613, 56 S.Ct. 600, 80 L.Ed. 920 (1936); Dempsey v. Pink, 92 F. 2d 572 (2d Cir.1937), cert. denied, 303 U.S. 648, 58 S.Ct. 747, 82 L.Ed. 1109 (1938); Slotkin v. Brookdale Hospital Center, 357 F.Supp. 705, 707-08 (S.D.N.Y.1972). (c) Other Factors Various other factors canvassed by the Supreme Court are of relatively minor significance here. None of them, indi…
-
Wilhoit v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 143 F.2d 14 (6th Cir. 1943)…istrict Court renounce jurisdiction in favor of the state court where the action is in personam. Kline v. Burke Construction Co., 260 U.S. 226, 230, 43 S.Ct. 79, 67 L.Ed. 226, 24 A.L.R. 1077; Dempsey v. Pink, 2 Cir., 92 F. 2d 572, certiorari denied, 303 U.S. 648, 58 S. Ct. 747, 82 L.Ed. 1109. The question whether the District Court was correct in determining that the Corporation is entitled to interest involves a construction of the material sections of the federal statute, which read as follows: Section…