PHILLIPS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• AIR Line Pilots Ass'n v. United AIR Lines, Inc., 802 F.2d 886 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …categories or employer-employee classifications under other statutes are not of controlling significance”). ALPA’s reliance on Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Railway Employees’Dep’t of Am. Fed’n of Labor, 93 F. 2d 340 (6th Cir. 1937), cert. denied, 303 U.S. 649, 58 S.Ct. 746, 82 L.Ed. 1110 (1938), is inapposite. The issue in Nashville was whether a person who had performed services for his employer in the past but was now on temporary furlough should be considered an employee under the RLA. The court held…
• William B. Teasdale in Bankr. of Royal Laundries, Inc. v. Robinson, 290 F.2d 108 (8th Cir. 1961)
  …funds received prior to bankruptcy by the president of a bankrupt corporation which he created and rendered insolvent. Lunsford v. Haynie, 5 Cir., 175 F. 2d 603, 607. See, also, Rabinovitz v. Oughton, 3 Cir., 92 F. 2d 297, 298-299, certiorari denied 303 U.S. 649, 58 S.Ct. 746, 82 L.Ed. 1110; May v. Henderson, supra, at page 119 of 268 U. S., at page 460 of 45 S.Ct. [*115] The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in the Rabinovitz case, supra, in sustaining a turn-over order against the president a…
• Ry. Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Nat'l Mediation Bd., 988 F.2d 133 (D.C. Cir. 1993)
  …ed, had been rejected in the context at issue "[m]ore than a half century ago” as “narrow and too literal.” PCCA, 872 F. 2d at 461 (citing Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Railway Employees’ Dep’t of AFL, 93 F. 2d 340, 342 (6th Cir.1937), cert. denied, 303 U.S. 649, 58 S.Ct. 746, 82 L.Ed. 1110 (1938)). The definition of voter-eligible employees challenged in PCCA could hardly be characterized as a "gross violation” of the RLA. Here, in contrast, not only is NMB's current interpretation of Section 2, Ninth with…