UNITED STATES

v.

RAYNOR

Citator

Cited By

• Ryan v. United States, 278 F.2d 836 (9th Cir. 1960)
  …trict construction of penal statutes does not require that such statute be strained or distorted in order to exclude conduct clearly intended to be within its scope. United States v. Raynor, 302 U.S. 540, 58 S.Ct. 353, 82 L.Ed. 413, rehearing denied 303 U.S. 665, 58 S.Ct. 520, 82 L.Ed. 1123. Where the general purpose of legislation is manifest and subserved by giving words their ordinary meaning, the rule that criminal statutes are to be strictly construed is inapplicable. United States v. P. Koenig Coal Co…
• Est. of Floyd B. Faulkerson v. United States, 301 F.2d 231 (7th Cir. 1962)
  …L.Ed.2d 79; Wolfsen v. Smyth, 9 Cir., 223 F. 2d 111, 113-114 (1955); Newman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 9 Cir., 222 F. 2d 131, 136 (1955); Brainard v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 7 Cir., 91 F. 2d 880, 883-884 (1937), appeal dismissed, 303 U.S. 665, 58 S.Ct. 748, 82 L.Ed. 1122; Treas [*233] ury Regulations on Estate Tax, 1954 Code, Section 20.2056 (e)-2(d) (2). On the question of the binding effect of the state court decree, we find a somewhat analogous situation in Brainard where we consider…
• Bartels v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 100 F.2d 813 (5th Cir. 1938)
  …h is in accord with Massey v. Farmers & Merchants National Bank & Trust Company, 4 Cir., 94 F. 2d 526, wherein certiorari was applied for by eminent counsel, and the application was afterward withdrawn prior to a ruling thereon by the Supreme Court. 303 U.S. 665, 58 S.Ct. 761, 82 L.Ed. 1122. The real question at issue in this case is whether appellant is entitled to, petition the court to allow him to retain possession of his property for a period of three years, during which it shall stay all judicial pro…