INDIANA EX REL. ANDERSON
v.
BRAND, TRUSTEE

U.S. | 1938-02-28
No. 256
303 U.S. 667 Supreme Court of the United States (1938) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gen. Elec. Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co., 146 F.2d 414 (3d Cir. 1944)
    …ctric Co. v. Save, 6 Cir., 82 E.2d 100, and by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp., 2 Cir., 93 F. 2d 671, certiorari denied 303 U.S. 641, 58 S.Ct. 610, 82 L.Ed. 1101, rehearing denied 303 U.S. 667, 58 S.Ct. 749, 82 L. Ed. 1124. See also the concurring opinions in Euso Electric Works v. Canadian General Electric Company, Limited, in the Supreme Court of Canada, 1940, 2 DLR 1. S.C.R. at page 371 and page 381, delivered in the suit on the Canadi…
  • Greenberry Simmons v. City OF EL Paso, 320 F.2d 541 (5th Cir. 1963)
    …e appellant’s predecessor in title and the State was made pursuant to the statute, and the provisions of the statute became terms of the contract. Indiana ex rel. Anderson v. Brand, 303 U.S. 95, 58 S.Ct. 443, 82 L.Ed. 685, 113 A.L.R. 1482, reh. den. 303 U.S. 667, 58 S.Ct. 641, 82 L.Ed. 1123. See also Dodge v. Board of Education, 302 U.S. 74, 58 S.Ct. 98, 82 L.Ed. 57; Hall v. Wisconsin, 103 U.S. 5, 26 L.Ed. 302. The United States Constitution provides that “No State shall * * * pass * * * any * * * Law imp…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw