NEW NEGRO ALLIANCE ET AL.
v.
SANITARY GROCERY CO.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Supreme Court held that a dispute between the New Negro Alliance and Sanitary Grocery Co. constituted a labor dispute under the Norris-LaGuardia Act even though it did not involve traditional employment terms such as wages, hours, or unionization, but rather concerned the grocer's hiring practices and discrimination against Black workers. The Court's amendment to its opinion clarified that labor disputes under the Act extend beyond disputes over conventional working conditions to encompass broader disputes about employment opportunities and discriminatory hiring practices.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
It is ordered that the opinion in this cause be amended (lj by striking out the last three sentences in the first full paragraph on page 5 and substituting therefor the following: “The Court of Appeals thought thát the dispute'was not a labor dispute within the Norris-LaGuardia Act because it did not involve terms and conditions of employment such as wages, hours,- unionization or betterment of, working conditions, and that the trial court, therefore; had jurisdiction to issue the injunction. We think the conclusion that the dispute was not a_ labor dispute within the meaning of the Act, because it did not involve terms and conditions of employment in the sense of Wages, hours, unionization or betterment of working conditions is erroneous.”;
(2) By striking out of the second full paragraph on page 6 the first and second sentences and so much of the third sentence as reads: “In the first place” and starting a new sentence with a capital “T”;
(3) By striking out the words. “In the second place” in the fourth sentence in the second full paragraph on page 6 and beginning the sentence with a capital “T.”
Opinion reported as amended, 303 U. S. 552.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Grace v. Magruder, 148 F.2d 679 (D.C. Cir. 1945)…which ‘must be read in the light of the mischief to be corrected and the end to be attained.’ South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. Bassett, 309 U.S. 251, 259, 60 S.Ct. 544, 549, 84 L.Ed. 732; cf. New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co., 303 U.S. 552, 304 U.S. 542, 58 S.Ct. 703, 82 L.Ed. 1012; Milk Wagon Drivers’ Union, Local No. 753 v. Lake Valley Farm Products Co., 311 U.S. 91, 61 S.Ct. 122, 85 L.Ed. 63.”10 The District Court correctly held, therefore, that the common law cases which define employees and in…
-
Am. Med. Ass'n v. United States (D.D.C. 1942)…advocated by such Fund; that HOLC was diverting Government moneys to subsidize GHA and thereby enabling it to sell medical services at less than cost; * * [Italics supplied] New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Gro [*242] cery Co., 303 U.S. 552, amended, 304 U.S. 542, 58 S.Ct. 703, 82 L.Ed. 1012. Norris-LaGuardia Act of March 23, 1932, 47 Stat. 73, 29 U.S.C.A. § 113(c). Columbia River Packers Ass’n, Inc., v. Hinton, 315 U.S. 143, 62 S.Ct. 520, 86 L.Ed. -; Note, 51 Yale L.J. 1039, 1040-1041. H.R.Rep. No. 612,…1 / 4
-
Donnelly Garment Co. v. Dubinsky, 154 F.2d 38 (8th Cir. 1946)…rs’ Union v. Lake Valley Farm Products, Inc., supra 311 U.S. at pages 100-102, 61 S.Ct. 122, 85 L.Ed. 63; Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co., 303 U.S. 323, 330, 58 S.Ct. 578, 82 L.Ed. 872; New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co., 303 U.S. 552, 561, 562, 304 U.S. 542, 58 S.Ct. 703, 82 L.Ed. 1012; Fur Workers Union, Local No. 72 v. Fur Workers Union, 70 App.D.C. 122, 105 F. 2d 1, 5. In support of the necessary finding upon the issue under discussion, appellants rely wholly on proof of the failure of police offic…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co., 303 U.S. 552 (U.S. 1938)