FORT WORTH

v.

MCCAMEY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• In re Chicago Rapid Transit Co. Chicago Junction R. Co. v. Sprague, 129 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1942)
  …and consequently he is accountable to the latter only for the net earnings if there are any and is entitled to recover for net losses.” In re Connecticut Co., 2 Cir., 95 F. 2d 311, 316, certiorari denied Connecticut Ry. & L. Co. v. Connecticut Co., 304 U.S. 571, 58 S.Ct. 1041, 82 L.Ed. 1535. The trustees have no obligation to pay the rentals due under the leases, as such, unless and until they affirm the leases. They have a reasonable time within which to affirm or disaffirm. During the interim their sole…
• In re Reorganization of Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 111 F.2d 932 (3d Cir. 1940)
  …New York Rys. Co., 2 Cir., 282 F. 523; Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Brooklyn Rapid T. Co., 2 Cir., 6 F. 2d 547. In re Connecticut Co., 2 Cir., 95 F. 2d 311, certiorari denied sub nomine, Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co. v. Connecticut Co., 304 U.S. 571, 58 S.Ct. 1041, 82 L.Ed. 1535. See oases cited in note 12, supra, Public Service Commission v. Philadelphia Rapid T. Co., 3 Cir., 82 F. 2d 481. 11 U.S.C.A. § 516(4). Michigan v. Michigan Trust Co., 286 U.S. 334, 52 S.Ct. 512, 76 L.Ed. 1136; Coy…
• Loughman v. Town OF Pelham (Employers Liab. Assur. Corp., 126 F.2d 714 (2d Cir. 1942)
  …for a deposit of county funds. It was held that it did, but the bank was not closed until October 18, 1930, several months after the enactment of the enabling amendment. In City of Fort Worth v. McCamey, 5 Cir., 93 F. 2d 964, 969, certiorari denied 304 U.S. 571, 58 S.Ct. 1041, 82 L.Ed. 1535, where the bank closed prior to June 25, 1930, the pledge, was not validated because ■“on the appointment of a receiver the rights of everyone concerned become fixed.” To the same effect are Webb v. American Surety Co.,…