DAVILLA

v.

BRUNSWICK-BALKE-COLLENDER CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Getty Petroleum Corp. v. Bartco Petroleum Corp., 858 F.2d 103 (2d Cir. 1988)
  …sion was construed at the time the Lanham Act was under consideration as a compensatory measure and not as a punitive measure. See Koelemay, supra, at 523; see also Davilla v. Brunswick-Balke Collender Co., 94 F. 2d 567, 570 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 304 U.S. 572, 58 S.Ct. 1040, 82 L.Ed. 1536 (1938). [*111] During the 1925 joint hearings on the draft of an early trademark bill, Rogers contrasted the 1905 Act’s treble damages provision with a proposed provision that would give courts discretion to raise or lo…
• F.E.L. Publ'ns, Ltd. v. Catholic Bishop OF Chicago, 754 F.2d 216 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …as a penalty, see Universal Pictures v. Harold Lloyd Corp., 162 F. 2d 354, 378 (9th Cir. 1947); Sammons v. Colonial Press, Inc., 126 F. 2d 341, 350 (1st Cir.1942); Davilla v. Brunswick-Balke Collender Co., 94 F. 2d 567, 568 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 304 U.S. 572, 58 S.Ct. 1040, 82 L.Ed. 1536 (1938), and that statutory damages are not available when actual damages can be proved. [*219] See Washingtonian Pub. Co. v. Pearson, 140 F. 2d 465, 466 (2d Cir.1944); Doehrer v. Caldwell, 207 U.S.P.Q. 391, 393 (N.D.Ill…