AMERICAN LECITHIN CO.

v.

J. C. FERGUSON MFG. WORKS, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Dawson Chem. Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co., 448 U.S. 176 (U.S. 1980)
  …al as in Mercoid, the Court treated staple and nonstaple materials alike insofar as patent misuse was concerned. It is especially interesting that the Court cites J. C. Ferguson Works v. American Lecithin Co., 94 F. 2d 729, 731 (CA1), cert. denied, 304 U. S. 573 (1938), as a decision supporting the inapplicability of the misuse doctrine to efforts to control nonstaples. That case was a decision [*230] by the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, and the same Court of Appeals in B. B. Chemical expressly i…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corp. of Am., 166 F.2d 286 (3d Cir. 1948)
  …whatever the nature of the device by which the .owner of the patent seeks to effect such unauthorized extention of the monopoly.” J. C. Ferguson Manufacturing Works v. American Lecithin Co., 1 Cir., 1938, 94 F. 2d 729, at page 731, certiorari denied 304 U.S. 573, 58 S.Ct. 1042, 82 L.Ed. 1537, “Broad expressions as to contributory infringe-mont used in earlier cases * * * must now be read with the Carbice and Leitch Cases in mind.” Mercoid Corp. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co., 1944, 320 U.S. 680, 64…
• Kool Kooshion MFG. Co. v. Mitchell MFG. Co., 102 F.2d 37 (8th Cir. 1939)
  …here was before the trial court even though the matter is urged here by an appellee. Herman Body Co. v. St. Louis Body & Equipment Co., 8 Cir., 46 F. 2d 879; Oliver-Sherwood Co. v. Patterson-Ballagh Corp., 9 Cir., 95 F. 2d 70, 72, certiorari denied 304 U.S. 573, 58 S.Ct. 1042, 82 L.Ed. 1537; Mills Novelty Co. v. Monarch Tool & Manufacturing Co., 6 Cir., 49 F. 2d 28, certiorari denied 284 U. S. 662, 52 S.Ct. 37, 76 L.Ed. 561. Also, see Morley Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 300 U.S. 185, 191, 57…