AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK
v.
AMES ET AL.
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK
AMES ET AL.
304 U.S. 577
Supreme Court of the United States (1938)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Achille F. Ford v. United States, 276 F.2d 17 (Ct. Cl. 1960)…me as a part of this dissenting opinion as follows: I believe that the correct principles governing the disposition of these cases were stated in Alamo National Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 1938, 95 F. 2d 622, certiorari denied 304 U.S. 577, 58 S.Ct. 1047, 82 L.Ed. 1541. In that case, a company that was wholly owned by Lewis W. Alexander and his wife acquired prior to March 1, 1913 an exclusive franchise to bottle and distribute Coca Cola in certain Texas counties. In 1921, the company…1 / 2
-
Shook v. United States, 713 F.2d 662 (11th Cir. 1983)…hares agreed upon audit of her estate tax return. The district court’s reliance on the doctrine of quasi-estoppel rests on the line of cases originating with Alamo National Bank of San Antonio v. Commissioner, 95 F. 2d 622 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 304 U.S. 577, 58 S.Ct. 1047, 82 L.Ed. 1541 (1938). See, e.g., Beltzer v. United States, 495 F. 2d 211 (8th Cir.1974); Continental Oil Co. v. Jones, 177 F. 2d 508 (10th Cir.1949); Griffith [*667] v. United States, 71-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) ¶9280 (N.D.Tex.1971);…
-
A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckles Rederi v. Tidewater Constr. Corp., 559 F.2d 928 (4th Cir. 1977)…is no right to indemnification until there has been actual loss or damage suffered by the indemnitee. City of Richmond v. Branch, 205 Va. 424, 137 S.E. 2d 882 (1964); American National Bank v. Ames, 169 Va. 711, 748, 194 S.E. 784, 797, cert. denied, 304 U.S. 577, 58 S.Ct. 1046, 82 L.Ed. 1540 (1938).…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence