MEYERS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Isaacs v. United States, 301 F.2d 706 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …nvince that it is part of it.” Cf. United States v. Cohen, 3 Cir., 197 F. 2d 26, 29; Nye & Nissen v. United States, 9 Cir., 168 F. 2d 846, 852, aff’d 336 U.S. 613, 69 S.Ct. 766, 93 L.Ed. 919; Meyers v. United States, 6 Cir., 94 F. 2d 433, cert. den. 304 U.S. 583, 58 S.Ct. 1059, 82 L.Ed. 1545. It is not necessary to support a finding of the existence of an overall scheme or conspiracy that each participant knew others involved therein or the precise part each was playing. Lefco v. United States, 3 Cir., 74…
• United States v. Durrive, 902 F.2d 1221 (7th Cir. 1990)
  …y little is required to show that a defendant became a party — ‘slight evidence may be sufficient to connect the defendant with it.’ ” Hernandez, 300 F. 2d at 121-22. Nye & Nissen cited Meyers v. United States, 94 F. 2d 433 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 304 U.S. 583, 58 S.Ct. 1059, 82 L.Ed. 1545 (1938), and Phelps v. United States, 160 F. 2d 858 (8th Cir.1947), cert. denied, 334 U.S. 860, 68 S.Ct. 1525, 92 L.Ed. 1780 (1948), for its slight evidence standard.3 Unfortunately, the court in Nye [*1227] & Nissen cor…
• Koolish v. United States, 340 F.2d 513 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …nvince that it is part of it.’ Cf. United States v. Cohen, 3 Cir., 197 F. 2d 26, 29; Nye & Nissen v. United States, 9 Cir., 168 F. 2d 846, 852, aff’d 336 U.S. 613, 69 S.Ct. 766, 93 L.Ed. 919; Meyers v. United States, 6 Cir., 94 F. 2d 433, cert. den. 304 U.S. 583, 58 S.Ct. 1059, 82 L.Ed. 1545. “It is not necessary to support a finding of the existence of an overall scheme or conspiracy that each participant knew others involved therein or the precise part each was playing. Lefco v. United States, 3 Cir., 74…