DILLARD
v.
PIONEER TITLE INSURANCE & TRUST CO. ET AL.

U.S. | 1938-10-10
No. 179
305 U.S. 557 Supreme Court of the United States (1938) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 238, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 938); § 266, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 938); Stratton v. St. Louis S. W. Ry., 282 U. S. 10, 15-16; U. S. Naturopathic Assn. v. Chiropractic League, 296 U. S. 539, 540.

Mr. Calvin S. Mauk for appellant.

Mr. Ben Harrison for appellees.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Meyer, 140 F.2d 652 (2d Cir. 1944)
    …g, the constitutionality of the statute or order granting the authority in the first place is immaterial. United States v. Kapp, 302 U.S. 214, 58 S.Ct. 182, 82 L.Ed. 205; Kay v. United States, 303 U.S. 1, 58 S.Ct. 468, 82 L.Ed. 607; Carter v. Texas, 305 U.S. 557, 59 S.Ct. 71, 83 L.Ed. 351; Boehm v. United States, 8 Cir., 123 F. 2d 791, certiorari denied 315 U.S. 800, 62 S.Ct. 626, 86 L.Ed. 1200, rehearing denied 315 U.S. 828, 62 S.Ct. 794, 86 L.Ed. 1223. And here the combination of Executive Order 9066, Pu…
  • United States v. Barra, 149 F.2d 489 (2d Cir. 1945)
    …annot justify his falsehood by a collateral attack upon the authority. This follows from the decisions in United States v. Kapp, 302 U.S. 214, 58 S.Ct. 182, 82 L.Ed. 205; Kay v. United States, 303 U.S. 1, 58 S.Ct. 468, 82 L.Ed. 607; Carter v. Texas, 305 U.S. 557, 59 S.Ct. 71, 83 L.Ed. 351. Such authority is clearly present here. 50 U.S.C.A. § 21 not only gives the President power to restrain alien enemies in this country, but confers upon him the further authority “to establish any other regulations which…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw