HICKS

v.

MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. State TAX Comm'n, 481 F.2d 963 (1st Cir. 1973)
  …“preservation of home owners and the promotion of a sound system of home mortgage,” has been said to affect the welfare of the nation as a whole. First Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Loomis, 97 F. 2d 831, 840 (7th Cir. 1938), cert. granted, 305 U.S. 564, 59 S.Ct. 92, 83 L. Ed. 355 (1938); dismissed on motion of counsel for petitioners sub nom. Martin v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 305 U.S. 666, 59 S.Ct. 363, 83 L.Ed. 432 (1938). See Fahey v. O’Melveny, 200 F. 2d 420 (9th Cir. 1952), cert. d…
• United States v. Fed. Credit Co., 117 F.2d 341 (5th Cir. 1941)
  …nited States, 4 Cir., 111 F. 2d 764; United States v. Ford Truck, etc., 3 Cir., 115 F. 2d 864. United States v. One 1935 Dodge Rack-Body Truck, 2 Cir., 88 F. 2d 613; United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, 4 Cir., 93 F. 2d 771; Id., 305 U.S. 564, 59 S.Ct. 99, 83 L.Ed. 555; Id., 307 U.S. 219, 59 S.Ct. 861, 83 L.Ed. 1249; United States v. O’Dea Finance Co., 8 Cir., 111 F. 2d 358; United States v. One Studebaker Coach, D.C., 24 F.Supp. 76; United States v. One Ford Coupe, D.C., 24 F.Supp. 74.…
• Chesebro v. Los Angeles Cnty. Flood Control Dist., 306 U.S. 459 (U.S. 1939)
  …n adequate non-federal grounds. We dismissed the city’s appeal for want'of a substantial federal question and postponed to the hearing on the merits further consideration [*463] of the question of jurisdiction and of the motion to dismiss or affirm. 305 U. S. 564. That motion is denied. The validity of tne statute under the federal constitution was by the petition appropriately drawn in question and in substance the decision of the state supreme' court is in favor of its validity. See Bryant v. Zimmerman, 2…