UNITED STATES

v.

ONE 1936 MODEL FORD V-8 DE LUXE COACH

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Gross, 416 F.2d 1205 (8th Cir. 1969)
  …States v. Thompson, 251 U.S. 407, 413-414, 40 S.Ct. 289, 64 L.Ed. 333 (1920); Ex parte United States, 287 U.S. 241, 250-251, 53 S.Ct. 129, 77 L.Ed. 283 (1932); Alexander v. United States, 95 F. 2d 873, 881 (8 Cir. 1938), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 637, 59 S.Ct. 99, 83 L.Ed. 409. 4. The argument that the indictment was the fruit of incompetent or inadmissible evidence cannot prevail. Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 363-364, 76 S.Ct. 406, 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956); Lawn v. United States, 355 U.S. 339, 349-…
• Davenport v. United States, 260 F.2d 591 (9th Cir. 1958)
  …n can not be 'used as establishing overt acts of the conspirators. This is not true. We hold that the indictment sufficiently charged the defendant with a crime. Alexander v. United States, 8 Cir., 1938, 95 F. 2d 873, certiorari denied 305 U.S. 637, 59 S.Ct. 99, 83 L.Ed. 409; United States v. Cohen, 2 Cir., 1944, 145 F. 2d 82, certiorari denied 323 U.S. 799, 65 S.Ct. 553, 89 L.Ed. 637; Allen v. United States, supra; Shayne v. United States, 9 Cir., 1958, 255 F. 2d 739. In Assignment of Error No. 2, appell…
• United States v. State TAX Comm'n, 481 F.2d 963 (1st Cir. 1973)
  …s and the promotion of a sound system of home mortgage,” has been said to affect the welfare of the nation as a whole. First Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Loomis, 97 F. 2d 831, 840 (7th Cir. 1938), cert. granted, 305 U.S. 564, 59 S.Ct. 92, 83 L. Ed. 355 (1938); dismissed on motion of counsel for petitioners sub nom. Martin v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 305 U.S. 666, 59 S.Ct. 363, 83 L.Ed. 432 (1938). See Fahey v. O’Melveny, 200 F. 2d 420 (9th Cir. 1952), cert. denied sub nom. Willhoit v. F…